Tuesday, October 31, 2006

Dream 7a: Baby Kṛṣṇa

Like I said my memory is failing. A dream was missed in the previous list. About eight-months ago, I saw the cosmos and heavenly objects of all colors moving around in a celestial kaleidoscope. Amidst that, I saw Baby Kṛṣṇa with his mouth open and showing the cosmos inside His mouth to Mother Yaśodā. My viewpoint was behind the Mother so I don't remember any sight of Her. Kṛṣṇa was standing still all this while. The dream finished at that point.
PS: I noticed that Internet Explorer is displaying diacritics badly. I will urge the visitors to move to Firefox for better and safer browsing.

7 comments:

♥Jennifer Ann♥ said...

IT WASNT UNTIL I WENT ONLINE AND LOOKED UP THESE CREATURES FROM MY DREAM, THAT I REALIZED THEY WERE GANESH AND GARUDA.

BOTH AT DIFFERENT ENDS OF A COLLISIUM TYPE PLACE IN THE SKY.

I WAS IN THE CENTER. AS I LOOKED AT THEM FROM FAR AWAY(THE CENTER OF THIS PLACE , TO ME) THEIR FACES ZOOMED IN SO I COULD SEE THEM CLOSE UP WITHOUT MOVING TOWARD THEM AT ALL.

I QUICKLY SAW GARUDA, THEN FOR MORE THAN 10 SECONDS I GOT TO SEE GANESH WHO REVEALED HIMSELF TO ME. HE AT FIRST HAD SOMETHING COVERING HIS FACE AS IF NOT TO SCARE ME, BUT WHEN MY EYES WERE FIXED ON HIM HE REMOVED HIS MASK TO REVEAL HIS ELEPHANT FACE.
I HAVE NEVER SEEN THESE IMAGES IN MY LIFE HERE ON EARTH.

THESE THINGS I DESCRIBED TO YOU COME AT THE END OF MY DREAM.
AT THE BEGINNING OF MY DREAM I AM REUNITED WITH MY DEAD BEST FRIEND WHO I THINK WAS KILLED.
AFTER BEING WITH THIS FRIEND I REALIZE I AM BEING FOLLOWED BY HIS KILLER.
I WANT TO FIND ANSWERS SO I TAKE MY FRIEND AWAY, ONLY TO APPEAR WITHOUT HIM IN FRONT OF THESE TWO GREAT CREATURES.

I WAS RAISED CATHOLIC, BUT I BELIEVE IN REINCARNATION, AND THAT THIER COULD BE OTHER GODS, SOMEWHERE.
I PRAY DAILY.
I WANT TO KNOW WHY GANESH STOOD BEFORE ME.
I WANT TO GO BACK TO THAT PLACE.
I THOUGHT I WOULD TELL YOU, CAUSE I DONT KNOW WHY REALLY.

animesh said...

Hi Persian Queen:

Your dream certainly sounds interesting. While I do see dreams like what you said, I don't think I can interpret them.

I really wish you get the answers. I will ask these questions to the God within, usually God provides the best answers. Let me know if you want to learn more on this.

Best, Animesh

Anonymous said...

Hi,

Why are you so much into dreams? Experience God in daily life in waking world. See how beautiful his creation is.

I would suggest you read and understand the importance given by the (Shankara's) non-duality theory: NOTHING. well, almost.


[I donot mean to be rude/offensive. I am sorry if I sounded so. I however think that meditation and contemplation are more important than astral-stuff or interpretation of dreams.]

Regards
Amar

animesh said...

Why are you so much into dreams? Experience God in daily life in waking world. See how beautiful his creation is.

I would suggest you read and understand the importance given by the (Shankara's) non-duality theory: NOTHING. well, almost.


It is interesting that one side you are calling the creation as beautiful and then you are citing Shankara's non-duality.

As per non-duality (and it pre-dates Shankara, Shankara just revived it) everything is identical and one should be dispassionate and realise the formless Brahman.

Then how is creation beautiful?

I am not into interpretations of dreams, I just like these dreams — when I see them I want to keep a note of them.

Anonymous said...

I would humbly suggest you to read what Swami Vivekananda (a great nondualist himself) says about dreams.

The theory of non-duality does not have negate the thought that "the world is beautiful".

I still think that this astral-stuff and vedanta are incompatible with each other.

I have already said enough on your blog, Regards and bye

animesh said...

Who is saying astral stuff here? I am just telling my dreams here --- if the world is beautiful, then so are dreams.

I wonder what's the great point that I am missing here.

Most of the Advaita theory says "satya.m brahma jaganmithyaa" which means the whole world is anitya or non-existent. A non-existent thing cannot be beautiful (logically).

Best,
A

Anonymous said...

Dear friends,

give this a try --> www.sahajayoga.org

Kind Regards
Igor